“Since the US Supreme Court hears only 80 cases a year, the state trial judge is key and must be held accountable by the public for purposefully refusing to apply the laws.”

“When a NJ courts judge is asked to reconsider a decision and in so doing ignores  facts, caselaw and public policy brought to its attention, this should no longer be considered  appealable  “error”  but is instead purposeful.”

“When a child who is repeatedly admonished not to do something, continues nevertheless, this is considered purposeful and this principle should apply to judges as well.”

“The purposeful refusal  to apply the laws is usually due to political influence, personal beliefs or sudden stupidity, none of which has a place in the courts. NJ courts which are complicit in protecting corrupt governments need to be changed.”

“Non-partisan elections and or county citizen review panels are the best way to hold judges, who purposefully refuse to enforce the laws, accountable.  Similarly, elections should also be considered for the attorney general who lacks oversight and accountability.”

“Governments, like courts which refuse to enforce the laws,  invariably are influenced by the same political operatives and reasons and so FairTrial reports on this when it gets in the way of enforcing the laws and attainment of justice..”